英语翻译ccording to landscape ecology,the spatial patternscontai

英语翻译
ccording to landscape ecology,the spatial patterns
contain information on the mechanisms that they emerge
from.Since spatial patterns and ecological functions are
interrelated,a certain landscape function can only be realized in a certain landscape patterns,and the sustainability
of regional ecosystem services is affected by
landscape spatial patterns.Thus,along with the development
of indicators for integrating landscape patterns
and ecological processes (Chen et al.,2009; 2010),it is
argued by a lot of scholars that landscape pattern indicator
is an important factor in regional ecological sustainability
evaluation,and sustainability assessment
should take spatial dimensions into account (Franke,
1996; Xiao et al.,1997; Backhaus et al.,2002; Blaschke,
2006).
In fact,according to the understanding of mutual
feedback between human society and natural ecosystems
in sustainability science,three levels can be distinguished
in the evaluation of regional ecological sustainability:
firstly,it is a kind of single factor analysis of
the mutual feedback between human activities and the
change of such ecological factors as regional climate,
soil,hydrology,and vegetation; secondly,based on the
construction of integrated indicators or indicator system,
it is the comprehensive index evaluation of regional
ecological sustainability with the integration of various
kinds of mutual feedback analysis in the first level; and
thirdly,it is to evaluate ecological sustainability in the
view of spatial patterns,with a focus on the interaction
mechanism between spatial patterns,ecological processes,
and socio-economic activities.However,the existing
sustainability indicators are usually derived from
the parameters that are not sensitive to spatial dimensions
(Backhaus et al.,2002).All the existing regional
ecological sustainability evaluation,regardless of using
the method of comprehensive index evaluation,monetary
valuation,or biophysical quantity measurement,
belong to the category of landscape function studies
without considering the impact of spatial patterns on the
function of ecological sustainability,even though the indicators of landscape patterns have been proven to be
good indicators for ecological sustainability evaluation
(Peterseil et al.,2004).Therefore,it is in great need to
combine spatial pattern analysis with ecological sustainability
evaluation through measuring the correlation
between landscape patterns and the coupled social and
natural processes.
第一个单词是according

根据景观生态学的空间格局
包含上出现,他们的机制的信息
从.由于空间格局和生态功能
相互关联的,只能在一定的景观功能得以实现,在一定的景观格局和可持续发展
区域生态系统服务的影响
景观空间格局.因此,随着科技的发展
整合景观格局指标
的生态过程,它是
辩称景观格局指标,许多学者
在区域生态可持续发展的重要因素
可持续发展评估
应该考虑的空间尺寸.
事实上,根据相互理解
人类社会和自然生态系统之间的反馈
在可持续发展的科学,可分为三个层次
在区域生态可持续性的评价：
首先,它是一种单因素分析
相互之间的人类活动与反馈
作为区域气候等生态因子的变化,
土壤,水文,植被;其次,基于
综合指标或指标体系建设,
它是区域的综合指数评价
整合各种与生态可持续性
种在第一层次的相互反馈分析;
第三,它是在生态可持续性评估
查看空间格局,以互动的焦点
之间的空间格局,机制
社会经济活动.然而,现有的
可持续发展指标通常来自
空间尺寸不敏感的参数
.所有现有的区域
生态可持续性评估,无论使用
综合指数评价,货币的方法
估值,或生物物理量的测量,
属于类景观功能的研究
不考虑空间格局的影响
生态可持续发展的功能,即使景观格局的指标已被证明是
良好的生态可持续发展能力评价指标
（Peterseil等,2004）.因此,它是非常需要的
结合生态可持续发展的空间格局分析
通过测量相关的评价
景观格局耦合社会之间