英语翻译We build on previous work in consumer shopping trip mode
来源:学生作业帮 编辑:大师作文网作业帮 分类:英语作业 时间:2024/11/18 04:55:40
英语翻译
We build on previous work in consumer shopping trip modeling and conjoint choice design to develop a new approach to investigating the tendency of consumers to combine multiple shopping purposes and destinations in their shopping trips.1 Our proposed approach is based on a combination of a multi-layered nested logit structure which captures the different purposes and stops in consumer shopping trips,and a purposely designed consumer choice experiment which allows one to measure aspects of consumer shopping trip decision making that are difficult to deduce from real world shopping data.In modeling terms,we build mainly on two previous models in the consumer shopping behavior literature.The first,introduced by Kitamura (1984),used the concept of prospective utility to model consumers’ choices of shopping trip chains.Prospective utility is defined recursively and the utility of each shopping destination is expressed in terms of its own utility plus the utility of possible other destinations in the trip chain,which itself again includes the utility of other destinations,etc.The model offers a framework to model trip chains or multi-stop trips that consumers make,but unfortunately falls short in that it does not allow for multi-purpose trips (i.e.trips where consumers buy several different types of products).
The second model we build on was introduced by Arentze,Borgers and Timmermans (1993) and largely deals with this latter element.Arentze,Borgers and Timmermans introduced a model that recursively describes consumer store choices for different categories of products.Products are ordered hierarchically on the basis of purchase frequency,and the utility of a shopping center is described as a function of two types of variables:the distance between the consumer’s home and the shopping center,and the shopping center’s range of product categories.However,their model does not incorporate multi-stop trips and it is not developed in the utility maximization framework of random utility theory.This makes it difficult to interpret the parameters of the model,to compare the model to empirical data that is stochastic in nature,or to compare the model to more conventional random utility approaches.
你看,我把分数提到40分了,我等级不高,翻译的东西很多,我把所有分数都投到我这篇翻译上去了~
We build on previous work in consumer shopping trip modeling and conjoint choice design to develop a new approach to investigating the tendency of consumers to combine multiple shopping purposes and destinations in their shopping trips.1 Our proposed approach is based on a combination of a multi-layered nested logit structure which captures the different purposes and stops in consumer shopping trips,and a purposely designed consumer choice experiment which allows one to measure aspects of consumer shopping trip decision making that are difficult to deduce from real world shopping data.In modeling terms,we build mainly on two previous models in the consumer shopping behavior literature.The first,introduced by Kitamura (1984),used the concept of prospective utility to model consumers’ choices of shopping trip chains.Prospective utility is defined recursively and the utility of each shopping destination is expressed in terms of its own utility plus the utility of possible other destinations in the trip chain,which itself again includes the utility of other destinations,etc.The model offers a framework to model trip chains or multi-stop trips that consumers make,but unfortunately falls short in that it does not allow for multi-purpose trips (i.e.trips where consumers buy several different types of products).
The second model we build on was introduced by Arentze,Borgers and Timmermans (1993) and largely deals with this latter element.Arentze,Borgers and Timmermans introduced a model that recursively describes consumer store choices for different categories of products.Products are ordered hierarchically on the basis of purchase frequency,and the utility of a shopping center is described as a function of two types of variables:the distance between the consumer’s home and the shopping center,and the shopping center’s range of product categories.However,their model does not incorporate multi-stop trips and it is not developed in the utility maximization framework of random utility theory.This makes it difficult to interpret the parameters of the model,to compare the model to empirical data that is stochastic in nature,or to compare the model to more conventional random utility approaches.
你看,我把分数提到40分了,我等级不高,翻译的东西很多,我把所有分数都投到我这篇翻译上去了~
我们建立在消费者的购物之旅的建模和设计的选择上交合合作开发一种新的方法来调查消费者倾向,结合他们的购物trips.1我们建议的方法多的购物目的和目的地是一个多方结合的基础,多层嵌套分对数结构,捕捉不同的目的和消...
英语翻译How does it build on your previous education?
英语翻译Human resource management mode:based on work and quality
请问这句意思we would like to pay you for previous work and this on
英语翻译On the same trip,further down by the plains,we stayed in
英语翻译the idea of was sold to the band on our previous work.
we are young ,we must build our lives on hard work and reali
英语翻译Like any other professional training we build on perviou
英语翻译In this tutorial when we mention the consumer we are ref
英语翻译We went on a school trip on Monday.
英语翻译Fashion consumer groups and online shopping at privatesa
翻译We should teach them to build their lives on hard work并改为被
Why can we gko on a field trip in spring