英语翻译请勿使用翻译软体!文章如下：Test of the Structural ModelAfter determin

英语翻译
请勿使用翻译软体!
文章如下：
Test of the Structural Model
After determining that the proposed model obtained convergent and discriminant validity based on the data,the structural model presented in Figure 1 was tested.As shown in Table 2,the overall fit statistics indicate acceptable fit of the model to the data (CFI = .968,x2 of 300.912,187 df; Anderson and Gerbing 1982,1988).
Table 2 shows the standardized parameters and t-values resulting from the testing.The proposed positive relationship between a firm’s preannouncement behavior and market anticipation (Hypothesis 7) was supported,but the hypothesized positive relationship between a firm’s preannouncement behavior and competitive equity was not (Hypothesis 1).In addition,the results support competitive equity’s proposed positive relationships with both market anticipation (Hypothesis 5) and new product success (Hypothesis 2),but not with NPD resources (Hypothesis 3).Regarding the influence of market anticipation,there is support for its posited positive relationship with NPD resources (Hypothesis 8),but not for its proposed positive relationship with new product success (Hypothesis 6).Lastly,the proposed positive relationship between NPD resources and new product success (Hypothesis 4) was also supported.
只要各位能够帮上我的忙,我给分绝对不会吝啬的.
切记：请勿使用翻译软体!
那麼就麻烦各位了,万事拜托了,
再三叮咛：请勿使用翻译软体！
翻译得愈通顺愈好，我必定会把分数送给你的！

Test of the Structural Model
机构模型测试
After determining that the proposed model obtained convergent and discriminant validity based on the data,the structural model presented in Figure 1 was tested.As shown in Table 2,the overall fit statistics indicate acceptable fit of the model to the data (CFI = .968,x2 of 300.912,187 df; Anderson and Gerbing 1982,1988).
在数据库基础上确定该模型具有收敛性和可判定的正确性后,在表一中的机构模型接受测试.如表2所示,全部的吻合数据说明该模型对数据库的适用性.
（CFI=.968,x2 of 300.912,187 df; 安德森和戈宾,1982,1988）
Table 2 shows the standardized parameters and t-values resulting from the testing.The proposed positive relationship between a firm’s preannouncement behavior and market anticipation (Hypothesis 7) was supported,but the hypothesized positive relationship between a firm’s preannouncement behavior and competitive equity was not (Hypothesis 1).In addition,the results support competitive equity’s proposed positive relationships with both market anticipation (Hypothesis 5) and new product success (Hypothesis 2),but not with NPD resources (Hypothesis 3).Regarding the influence of market anticipation,there is support for its posited positive relationship with NPD resources (Hypothesis 8),but not for its proposed positive relationship with new product success (Hypothesis 6).Lastly,the proposed positive relationship between NPD resources and new product success (Hypothesis 4) was also supported.
表2显示了从测试中得到的标准参数和估计值.
公司预告行为和市场参与度之间的关系（假定七）是正相关的,但是公司预告行为和公平竞争间的关系却不是（假定一）.
此外,测试结果表明公平竞争与市场参与度（假定五）以及新产品成功推出（假定二）之间存在正相关关系,但与新产品研发资源（假定三）之间没有.
关于市场参与度的影响,测试表明与其与新产品研发资源（假定八）之间存在正相关关系,但与新产品成功推出（假定六）无此种关系.
最后,新产品研发资源与新产品成功推出（假定四）之间同样存在正相关关系.
---老竹出品,