the more money , the happier?帮忙翻译啊谢谢啊

the more money , the happier?帮忙翻译啊谢谢啊
不要翻译器翻译的,请帮忙翻译啊,谢谢了谢谢了.急.In 1968,the America President Richard Nixon said,"In the next 20 years we shall become much richer ,but will we really be happier?" The wisdom of Nion's words is alomst a proved truth : beyond a certain point , when people's basic needs for food, shelter, social position and work are met, greater wealth does not bring more happiness.
The America of 2007 is far richer than the America of 1977.The average lifespan is 78 years, up from 1977. Their homes are bigger and crammed with more modern home appliances(microwave ovens, personal computers , flat-panel TVs).But their happiness has not increased.
According to a report of the National Opinion Research Centre at the university of Chicago,In 1977, 35.7 percent of Americans rated themselves "very happy", 53.2 percent "pretty happy" and 11 percent "not too happy",In 2007 , the figures were similar: 32.4 percent "very happy", 55.9 percent "pretty happy" and 11.7 percent "not too happy". Likewise, in most advanced countries, the degree of happiness has remained the same for decades.
so why doesn't happiness increase with money? some scholar say people want ever-bigger homes , because their friends have ever-bigger homes. but there is no extra pleasure in owning these bigger homes, because all our friends have them too. meanwhile, buying the house may make people become more anxious.and they may regret sacrificing some leisure--working harder to buy the bigger home. greater individual wealth does not bring greater national welfare.
moreover,the american government has igonred another important fact: people are not only no happier, they are in fact becoming mentally ill. once someone has the income of those among the top two--thirds of a developed nation, it makes no difference to his or her happiness or mental health.
A 25-year-old american today is between three and ten times more likely to be suffering from major sad feelings than in 1950. A normal modern North American child would standards.Answering the same questions , the anxiety as patients of mental illness in the 1950s. Similar rates of increase of anxiety have been found in Britain as well.
If the increase of money does not bring more happiness, then personal or national economic growth should not continue to be the major goal of the majotity of people or politicians in developed nations. Rather wo should pay more attention to the basic needs of children, especially infants.
Scientific evidence suggests that it is the care wo receive in the first 6 yesrs , not our genes, that most decides our ability to enjoy our life. the earlier a child is neglected or treated rudely, or has parents who divorced, the greater the child suffers from mental disorder later in life.
In conclusion , once your income has reached a certain level, it is the quality of your early care, rather than more money , that determines your ability to enjoy your life.
不要翻译器翻译的 谢谢啊

在1968年,美国总统理查德尼克松说：“在未来20年,我们将变得更加富裕,但我们真的是幸福?”在尼翁的话智慧,几乎是证明了的真理：超出了某一点,当人们的基本需要食品,住房,社会地位和工作得到满足,更多的财富并没有带来更多的幸福.
2007年美国是远远低于美国的平均寿命1977.The丰富的为78岁,高于1977年.他们的家庭更大,更现代的家电（微波炉,个人电脑,平板电视）挤.但他们的幸福并没有增加.
据芝加哥大学的报告,全国民意研究中心在1977年,百分之35.7的美国人认为自己“非常快乐”,百分之53.2“非常快乐”,百分之十一“不太高兴”,2007年,数字是相同的：32.4百分比“非常高兴”,百分之55.9“非常快乐”,百分之十一点七“不太高兴”.同样,在最先进的国家,幸福度在过去数十年不变.
为什么不幸福与金钱增加?一些学者说,人们希望越来越大的房子,因为他们的朋友越来越大屋.但没有在这些大屋拥有额外的快乐,因为我们所有的朋友们他们.同时,购买的房子可能使人们变得更anxious.and他们可能会后悔,牺牲一些闲暇 - 更加努力购买更大的房子.更多的个人财富并没有带来更大的国民福利.
此外,美国政府igonred另一个重要的事实：人不仅不开心,他们在成为精神病的事实.一旦有人对排名前二的收入 - 一个发达的国家的三分之二,它没有对他或她的幸福和精神健康.
一位25岁的美国人今天的三至10倍,是更有可能患有较1950年的主要悲伤的感情.一个正常的现代北美孩子将standards.Answering同样的问题,作为精神病患者在20世纪50年代的焦虑.增加的焦虑相似率在英国被发现也.
如果货币的增加并没有带来更多的快乐,那么个人或国家的经济增长不应当继续成为对人或发达国家的政治家majotity的主要目标.相反窝应更多地关注儿童的基本需要,特别是婴儿.
科学证据表明,这是照顾禾先获得6 yesrs,而不是我们的基因,多数决定的能力,享受我们的生活.早先一个孩子被忽视或粗暴对待,或有父母谁离婚,孩子越大,精神错乱在以后的生活受到影响.
总之,一旦你的收入已经达到了一定水平,这是您的早期护理,而不是更多的钱,这决定了你有能力享受生活的质量.