850字英语文章why do young people fell the need to breal away feom

850字英语文章
why do young people fell the need to breal away feom their farents?
900到1100个单词

jinboxiang3
为你提供的下文从年轻人与父母直接矛盾和一些必然原因出发,包括成年子女独立之后的一些作为,客观的做出了理论解释,希望能帮得上你.
why do young people fell the need to breal away feom their farents?
All the young people sometimes want to be on freedom without their parents,and its all hapened nearly when they are at 18 years.Then we want to feel that we can make someting wothout our parents.
But we can't forget that our parents are they who take care about us they pay
for our education,they are worried about us when we are seek and everything else.
I don't think that the young people
must to brake away with their parents,
until that they are sure that they can live and make money on their own.
For the parents the childrens are on first place and they will be very sed If their childrens break away from them.
The likelihood that an adult child will reside with parents declines very sharply after age 18:In 1990,74% of 18-19 year olds lived with parents,compared to 40% at ages 20-24 and 16% at ages 25-29 (US Bureau of the Census 1992a).A substantial minority of the unmarried,however,continues to live at home into middle age.Three recent studies using different data sets asked what percentage of over-65 parents have coresident adult children; all arrived at figures in the range of 13-15% (Aquilino 1990,Ward et al 1992,Speare & Avery 1993).Some of these children are young adults who have not left home yet,others are temporary returnees,but some are 35 or 40 and home to stay.Although coresidence declines with child's and parent's age,it remains a significant phenomenon across the life course.
If we take a longer perspective,there is even less evidence that this generation is slow to establish residential independence.Historical evidence suggests substantial diversity in unmarried children's homeleaving behavior in the West:although many adolescents from rural and working-class backgrounds left home at very early ages to enter an apprenticeship or domestic service,others stayed home until relatively late marriage (Wall 1978).Like other dimensions of the transition to adulthood,the major historical change in home leaving is the extent to which it is now concentrated in a relatively narrow age range.In past centuries (and in Latin America today),children left home at any age between 10 and 30 (Wall 1978,DeVos 1989); in western Europe and North America today,the end of coresidence occurs rather abruptly between ages 18 and 21.
One study of college students asked directly about the circumstances under which it was acceptable for adult children to live with their parents.Shehan & Dwyer (1989) report that most students felt 18 and 21 were appropriate ages to leave home and that financial difficulties were the chief legitimating factor for staying longer than this.Boys were more likely than girls to think parents had an obligation to house their children and less likely to think that children had an obligation to pay.Shehan & Dwyer (1989) conclude,many children "feel they have the right to expect such aid" (110).
TRANSITION TO ADULTHOOD:The end of coresidence and the establishment of independent living fall within the part of the life course known as the "transition to adulthood." Using indicators such as ending schooling,getting married,having children,and becoming a fulltime member of the labor force,a substantial research literature documents trends in this transition over the last century (e.g.Hogan 1981).
Although studies of home leaving and home returning are often framed as part of the transition to adulthood,scholars who focus directly on the transition seldom or never use evidence on home leaving as an indicator (Hogan 1981,Hogan & Astone 1986,Rindfuss 1990,Modell 1989).The omission is ironic given the ready availability of long time series and the readiness with which home returning can be viewed as symptomatic of the "disorder in the life course" (Rindfuss et al 1987).
The growth in nonfamily living among young adults may be seen within the larger historical pattern of growing individualism and reduced importance of family living; other indicators of these are elderly living alone,divorce,and cohabitation (Goldscheider & Waite 1991).Although some scholars attribute the change to secularization (Lesthaeghe 1983),others emphasize the role played by the affluence and security of contemporary society (see Finch 1989).The chief candidates to explain cross-national and historical differences are economic,legal,and demographic structures.