英语翻译一个公司或者一个机构需要一个管理者,而他下面还要有很多个部门管理者.每个人的思想是不同的,管理风格是不同的.再说

英语翻译
一个公司或者一个机构需要一个管理者,而他下面还要有很多个部门管理者.每个人的思想是不同的,管理风格是不同的.再说管理是个很抽象的东西,并不像书上所说的那么简单,很多事情你要因人而定,还要根据时代的进化而更改.所以,管理风格我个人觉得没有最好的.
美国爱荷华大学的Kurt Lewin即为管理风格论的代表.在1939年他将领导依使用职权的方式分为三种：autocratic、democratic or participative,laissez-faire,free-rein.即使如此简易的分类,每一类仍然有许多的实质差异.比如说,有些独裁者是被部属所热爱推崇,很关心民间疾苦.同样的,也有参与式的领导不但倾听部属意见,还竭尽所能的提供必要支持,让部属完成任务.在1958年,他奈班与史密特（R.Tanenbaum & W.H.Schmidt）提出一种连续性理论.将领导方式依下属参与决策的程度加以分类,大致分为四种：autocratic decision、joint decision、delegation、consultation.当然,领导者与部属之间影响力的比重不只区分为四种,若是切割再细些就变成一系列连续性的各种程度领导风格.整个决策中有一部分是领导者的影响力（A）,另一部分是被领导者的影响力（B）.若A比B小,表示为以下属为中心的领导模式；若A比B大,表示以上司为中心的领导模式.A=0是无为而治,B=0是独裁.若从整个决策看,那么要满足A＋B=1的A、B组合有无限多种.无限多组合就构成一系列连续性的各种程度领导风格.
由此可见管理风格并没有最好的.每个人的能力不同他的管理方式也是不同的,即使大家都学的是同种管理方式,但是每个领导者的魅力不同,他所带领的团队产生的效果也不同.简单的一个例子,一个很有能力很有魅力深得员工厚爱的领导来管理他的团队,总是比一个用同样管理风格的没能力没魅力的领导效果好.这真的是因人而定,所以我个人认为真的没有一个最还的管理风格.

A company or an organization need a superintendent,but under him must have many department superintendents.Each person's thought is different,manages the style is different.Also the management was a very abstract thing,did not look like that simply,many matters which in the book said you must because of the human decide,but must change according to the time evolution.Therefore,manages the style I not to think well.US University of Iowa's Kurt Lewin namely representative who discusses for the management style.He divided into 1939 the leader according to the use authority's way three kinds:autocratic,democratic or participative,laissez-faire,free-rein.Even so the simple classification,each kind still had many substantive differences.For example,some dictators are deeply loved by the subordinate the esteem,cares about the folk vigorous pain very much.Similarly,not only also has the participation-like leadership to listen attentively to the subordinate opinion,but also exhausts ability provides the essential support,lets the subordinate complete the task.In 1958,his nai class and Schmitt (R.Tanenbaum & W.H.Schmidt) advances one kind of continuous theory.Will lead the way to participate in policy-making according to the subordinate the degree classifying,divides into four kinds approximately:autocratic decision,joint decision,delegation,consultation.Certainly,not only between the leader and the subordinate the influence proportion the discrimination is four kinds,if cuts thin to turn a series of continuous again each kind of degree leadership style.In the entire decision-making has a part is leader's influence (A),another part is by leader's influence (B).If A is smaller than B,expresses for take the subordinate as the central leadership pattern; If A is bigger than B,expresses take the boss as the central leadership pattern.A=0 is governs by non-interference,B=0 is the dictatorship.If looked from the entire decision-making,then must satisfy A+B=1 A,the B combination to have infinite many kinds.The infinite multi-combinations constitute a series of continuous each kind of degree leadership style.thus it can be seen manages the style not well.Each person's ability is different he the mode of administration is also different,what even if everybody studies is the homogeneous mode of administration,but each leader's charm is different,he leads the team produces the effect is also different.A simple example,has ability to have the charm very much to be deep very much the staff deep affection leadership to manage his team,always uses the similar management style one ability charm leadership effect not to be better.What this is really decides because of the human,therefore I think really not a most management style also.