大师作文网跪求英语作文一篇,贫富差距,
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：大师作文网作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/11/17 08:08:13
跪求英语作文一篇,贫富差距,
The world's wealth continues to be unevenly distributed.For many years now,poor nations have complained that wealthy countries provide only enough aid to keep them poor and never enough to become self-sufficient; wealthy nations complain that the amount is sufficient but the management of the aid is poor.Discuss the reasons for both of the conflicting opinion.
英语,400字
The world's wealth continues to be unevenly distributed.For many years now,poor nations have complained that wealthy countries provide only enough aid to keep them poor and never enough to become self-sufficient; wealthy nations complain that the amount is sufficient but the management of the aid is poor.Discuss the reasons for both of the conflicting opinion.
英语,400字
It’s certainly true that without a profit motive,the rational thing to do would be to sit at home all day and play video games — or whatever other pursuit you might choose if you never had to worry about paying the bills.And history shows that government efforts to try to equalize wealth or manage economies usually backfire.
Inequality of wealth,by itself,isn’t new.In the past few decades,there’s evidence that the gap in some countries is widening – including the U.S.But super-rich folks like Forbes 400 billionaires and greedy corporate executives are hardly a recent phenomenon.
A hundred years ago,the wealth gap between the richest robber baron and the poorest farmer was wider than the current spread between a $100-million-a-year CEO and the worst-paid worker.And if you factor in modern health care,“conveniences” like cars,TVs and cellphones,the average American today probably enjoys a standard of living on a par with some of the richest Americans a century ago.So a widening income gap and wealth inequity doesn’t seem to have hurt progress.
The issue isn’t whether money is a potent incentive for keeping us all busy trying to buy or build a bigger house or inventing the next cool electronic device.The question is whether the playing field is level.Equality of opportunity isn’t just a matter of fairness.No society can expect to thrive if it doesn’t fully tap the talent and ability of its entire workforce — including those who happen to be born poor.
Economists talk about “human capital” like any other input to their economic models.In theory,free markets will allocate that human capital to the best use by rewarding best work that the market values the most highly.
Inequality of wealth,by itself,isn’t new.In the past few decades,there’s evidence that the gap in some countries is widening – including the U.S.But super-rich folks like Forbes 400 billionaires and greedy corporate executives are hardly a recent phenomenon.
A hundred years ago,the wealth gap between the richest robber baron and the poorest farmer was wider than the current spread between a $100-million-a-year CEO and the worst-paid worker.And if you factor in modern health care,“conveniences” like cars,TVs and cellphones,the average American today probably enjoys a standard of living on a par with some of the richest Americans a century ago.So a widening income gap and wealth inequity doesn’t seem to have hurt progress.
The issue isn’t whether money is a potent incentive for keeping us all busy trying to buy or build a bigger house or inventing the next cool electronic device.The question is whether the playing field is level.Equality of opportunity isn’t just a matter of fairness.No society can expect to thrive if it doesn’t fully tap the talent and ability of its entire workforce — including those who happen to be born poor.
Economists talk about “human capital” like any other input to their economic models.In theory,free markets will allocate that human capital to the best use by rewarding best work that the market values the most highly.