请帮忙分析解释一下这两个英语句子.
来源:学生作业帮 编辑:大师作文网作业帮 分类:英语作业 时间:2024/11/17 07:09:21
请帮忙分析解释一下这两个英语句子.
There's an element there about competition then,isn't there?
Is it if the railways hadn't been nationalized,they would simply have disappeared?
There's an element there about competition then,isn't there?
Is it if the railways hadn't been nationalized,they would simply have disappeared?
There's an element there about competition then, isn't there?
引导词:There
谓语动词:is
主语:an element
处所状语:there
方面状语:about competition
修饰competition的定语:then
反意疑问句:isn't there?
译文:那一点上有一个关于以后比赛的基本原则,不是吗?
Is it if the railways hadn't been nationalized, they would simply have disappeared?
这是一个多重复合句——
第一重:
主句:Is it …
复合表语从句:if the railways hadn't been nationalized, they would simply have disappeared
第二重:
条件状语从句: if the railways hadn't been nationalized, 假如这条铁路没有国有化
连词:if
主语:the railways
谓语动词:hadn't been nationalized(对过去虚拟的被动态)
主句:they would simply have disappeared 他们就会完全消失
主语:they
谓语动词:would have disappeared (对过去虚拟)
程度状语:simply
译文:那是不是假如这条铁路没有国有化他们就会完全消失呢?
引导词:There
谓语动词:is
主语:an element
处所状语:there
方面状语:about competition
修饰competition的定语:then
反意疑问句:isn't there?
译文:那一点上有一个关于以后比赛的基本原则,不是吗?
Is it if the railways hadn't been nationalized, they would simply have disappeared?
这是一个多重复合句——
第一重:
主句:Is it …
复合表语从句:if the railways hadn't been nationalized, they would simply have disappeared
第二重:
条件状语从句: if the railways hadn't been nationalized, 假如这条铁路没有国有化
连词:if
主语:the railways
谓语动词:hadn't been nationalized(对过去虚拟的被动态)
主句:they would simply have disappeared 他们就会完全消失
主语:they
谓语动词:would have disappeared (对过去虚拟)
程度状语:simply
译文:那是不是假如这条铁路没有国有化他们就会完全消失呢?