关于版权的英语翻译2Computer programs¬¬——software———is an area

关于版权的英语翻译2
Computer programs¬¬——software———is an area where copyright laws are up in the air. Right now, software is not adequately protected under the copyright laws, but this situation may soon change. However, depending on the circumstances, protection is sometimes available under the “common law” of unfair competition and trade secrets.
The Copyright Office dose not make an extensive examination of the substance of your work, because what you are keeping from the public domain is your way of expressing a concept, which concept anyone is entitled to use in his or her own words. That is, your “monopoly” dose not work a serious hardship on the public, so your work dose not have to pass a serious muster to earn its copyright protection. Obviously, if your work was primarily copied from a public domain work and you find yourself holding a certificate of copyright registration nonetheless, an “infringer” you seek to sue over the matter can raise a public domain defense, despite your registration.
Now, what about “fair use”? Fair use, as defined by Marybeth Peters, senior attorney/advisor to the Copyright Office, “allows copying without permission from or payment to, the copyright owner where the use is reasonable and not harmful to the rights of the copyright owner.” However, what is “reasonable” and “not harmful” is not necessarily determined by your personal beliefs.
Fair use is one of the most nebulous, tricky areas viewed differently depending on who is taking the copyright material from where, and to what end!
Foe example, your use of chunks of material from a copyrighted work, properly credited to the copyright owner, might be “fair use” in your doctoral thesis. But your use of the exact same chunk of quoted material, even if credited to the copyright owner, could get you into hot water if it is included in your article for the Chicago Tribune.

计算机程序¬ ¬ -软件- --是一个地区的版权法是在空中.现在,软件是没有得到足够的保护下,著作权法,但这种情况可能很快就会改变.然而,视情况而定,有时是保护现有的“普通法”的不公平竞争和商业秘密.
版权局剂量没有一个广泛考试的内容您的工作,因为你维持从公共领域是你的方式表达一个概念,这概念是任何人都有权使用他或她自己的话.这就是说,您的“垄断”剂量无法正常工作了严重的困难市民,使您的工作剂量没有通过一个严重鼓起赚取其版权保护.显然,如果你的工作主要是复制从公共领域的工作,你会发现自己持有证书的著作权登记然而,一个“侵权”你寻求起诉的问题可以提出一个公共领域的防守,尽管您的注册申请.
现在,有关“合理使用” 合理使用的规定,Marybeth彼得斯,资深律师/顾问,版权局,“允许未经允许复制或付款,版权拥有人的使用是合理的,而不是有害的权利,版权拥有者.”然而,什么是“合理的” ,“不伤害”并不一定是取决于您的个人信仰.
合理使用是最含糊不清的,视为棘手的领域不同是谁采取版权材料的地方,以及什么目的!
敌人例如,您使用大块的材料受版权保护工作,妥善贷记版权拥有者,可能是“公平使用”在您的博士论文.但是您使用完全相同大块引用的材料,即使记入版权拥有人,可以让你变成热水,如果它是包含在您的文章,芝加哥论坛报.