大师作文网赐我一篇关于LES的演讲稿
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：大师作文网作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/11/16 11:20:49
赐我一篇关于LES的演讲稿
课前三分钟演讲的 老师规定讲爱的 就像一篇文章一样吧
课前三分钟演讲的 老师规定讲爱的 就像一篇文章一样吧
What's morally wrong with homosexuality?
Consider the fact that right now there are thousands of people across the world… having sex.
It's kinda disconcerting when you think about it.
Especially when you realize you're sitting here listening to me.
But when I tell you some of these people are with partners of the same sex, and some of these people are with partners of the other sex, that fact seems to take on a significance all its own, and the question I want to explore tonight is---WHY?
What's morally wrong with homosexuality, if anything?
And if nothing, what's all the fuss about?
This is a wonderful, beautiful part of the human experience.
If we're gonna deny this to a whole group of people, saying you can't have that, that's wrong.
We'd better have a darn=damn good reason.
"Homosexuality is a THREAT to the moral fabric of our country. It's a THREAT to the nation's infrastructure."
How does what I do in bed threaten the nation's infrastructure?
I might think I'm powerful in bed, but wow that's a crazy claim.
"Nation's infrastructure'd better watch out tonight, babe."
They have this argument in their mind that the parts don't fit, and I realize that if I was going to address people's actual concerns, I would have to address this argument. So I actually have two responses to this argument.
First response: Yes, they do.
How do I know? Um, well because if they didn't, people would try it, it wouldn't work, and they go do something else.
I mean what that scenario gonna look like?
"Oh my god, the parts don't fit. What're we gonna do?"
"I don't know."
"Do you want to go bowling?"
"Sure. This isn't working."
I would actually saw people during a Q&A portion of a program. I'm not making this up---they're like: "Well, of course it's wrong, because..."
And I want to say: if you are doing it this way, you are doing it wrong. What do you want me to tell you?
When we talk about heterosexuality, we talk about that wild range of activities.
When we talk about homosexuality, we focus on the sex part of it.
This is not the only time we get the sort of false contrast.
I mean we say things...we say:
Heterosexual people, we talk about relationships, homosexual people, we talk about sex.
We say heterosexual people have "lives", homosexual people have "lifestyles".
We say heterosexual people have a "moral vision", homosexual people have an "agenda".
The words we use to talk about these things really affect our way of thinking about them.
I think the way gay and lesbian people are treated in our society is wrong!
Not just irrational, bur morally WRONG!
I think there's something perverted about the fact that we HATE people---because of whom they love; we do VIOLENCES against people---because of the affection that exists in their lives. And the effects of that treatment are a far greater moral tragedy than sex between consenting adults could ever be.
I'm asking you to put yourself in people's shoes before you judge them.
And I'm asking you to judge people not on WHOM they love, but on WHETHER they love.
That's my moral vision. That's my "agenda".
And I thank you for listening so patiently to me today. You've been a great audience.
Thank you very much.
再问： 中文的~~
再答： 自己稍稍翻译一下吧 蛮简单的……我最近实在没时间帮你翻了……
Consider the fact that right now there are thousands of people across the world… having sex.
It's kinda disconcerting when you think about it.
Especially when you realize you're sitting here listening to me.
But when I tell you some of these people are with partners of the same sex, and some of these people are with partners of the other sex, that fact seems to take on a significance all its own, and the question I want to explore tonight is---WHY?
What's morally wrong with homosexuality, if anything?
And if nothing, what's all the fuss about?
This is a wonderful, beautiful part of the human experience.
If we're gonna deny this to a whole group of people, saying you can't have that, that's wrong.
We'd better have a darn=damn good reason.
"Homosexuality is a THREAT to the moral fabric of our country. It's a THREAT to the nation's infrastructure."
How does what I do in bed threaten the nation's infrastructure?
I might think I'm powerful in bed, but wow that's a crazy claim.
"Nation's infrastructure'd better watch out tonight, babe."
They have this argument in their mind that the parts don't fit, and I realize that if I was going to address people's actual concerns, I would have to address this argument. So I actually have two responses to this argument.
First response: Yes, they do.
How do I know? Um, well because if they didn't, people would try it, it wouldn't work, and they go do something else.
I mean what that scenario gonna look like?
"Oh my god, the parts don't fit. What're we gonna do?"
"I don't know."
"Do you want to go bowling?"
"Sure. This isn't working."
I would actually saw people during a Q&A portion of a program. I'm not making this up---they're like: "Well, of course it's wrong, because..."
And I want to say: if you are doing it this way, you are doing it wrong. What do you want me to tell you?
When we talk about heterosexuality, we talk about that wild range of activities.
When we talk about homosexuality, we focus on the sex part of it.
This is not the only time we get the sort of false contrast.
I mean we say things...we say:
Heterosexual people, we talk about relationships, homosexual people, we talk about sex.
We say heterosexual people have "lives", homosexual people have "lifestyles".
We say heterosexual people have a "moral vision", homosexual people have an "agenda".
The words we use to talk about these things really affect our way of thinking about them.
I think the way gay and lesbian people are treated in our society is wrong!
Not just irrational, bur morally WRONG!
I think there's something perverted about the fact that we HATE people---because of whom they love; we do VIOLENCES against people---because of the affection that exists in their lives. And the effects of that treatment are a far greater moral tragedy than sex between consenting adults could ever be.
I'm asking you to put yourself in people's shoes before you judge them.
And I'm asking you to judge people not on WHOM they love, but on WHETHER they love.
That's my moral vision. That's my "agenda".
And I thank you for listening so patiently to me today. You've been a great audience.
Thank you very much.
再问： 中文的~~
再答： 自己稍稍翻译一下吧 蛮简单的……我最近实在没时间帮你翻了……